Nippon News Network (NNN)
I used security cameras with the "face authentication function" introduced by JR East to detect people who have committed serious crimes in the past, but from the target on the 21st. I found out that I removed it. ◇ The “crime prevention system” using the “face recognition function” provided by a company in Tokyo is instantly determined that a woman who registers a face photo in advance appears on a security camera. It is also assumed that the person is wearing a mask. For example, when an outsider enters an apartment, you can tell. "Face authentication technology" is evolving. However, JR East has changed its policy over this operation. At a station in Tokyo, a sticker was affixed to tell that a camera with a face authentication function was running. This detection was included in the nominated suspect and suspicious people at the station, as well as the sinners and temporary servants who committed serious crimes in stations and trains. However, on the 21st, it was found that the source was removed from the target. In the city. College student (20) "Is it different to infringe privacy and personal information so far?" "I think it's poor to monitor specially. It's difficult and very difficult." It is July. In JR East, we were strengthening railway security before the opening. For the purpose of detecting suspicious individuals, security cameras using face recognition technology were introduced at major terminal stations. ◇ Three years ago, when a working caster covered China. Working, "Is there so much? Camera. Isn't it about one in 50m?" Working "Who's photos?" I was exposed to the offender who crossed the red light with a face authentication camera and did not pay a fine. On the other hand, in some cases, in British trials, it was determined that "it is illegal to attach a facial authentication function to a security camera", stating that "there is no clear standard for which is the target of the judgment." We are concerned that the use of face authentication may violate human rights. ◇ JR East about what the source is removed from the target. JR East "I decided not to do so because of the lack of clear rules and social consensus." From the September 22 broadcast "NEWS ZERO".
